Paul, I recieved your message Sat. after I got off work, spending all day in front of that F------ computor. And tomorrow when I'm in a better mood, I'm going to reply at length to you. I feel the same way. I've got lots of "grey" whiskers and and my feeligs are that a computor still cannot go to the field and take dimensions. Talk at you tomorrow. Darrel Marshall piper82072@yahoo.com
> Is anyone else fed up with CAD as used for piping design?
>
> Back in the old fart days, a draftsman/designer had all the skills
> s/he needed, and was able to move from job to job. Now, the
> discipline is fragmented into little slices of Rebis/PDS/PDMS.
> Whatever happened to piping design as a discipline, anyway?
>
> I don't want to start a major argument, but sometimes I'd rather
> go back to the board.
>
> I feel like pitching a competition between a bunch of CAD guys vs.
> experienced old-timers. All things being equal, I think I know
> who'd win.
>
> Of course, criteria would have to be set first, taking into
> account the advantages and disadvantaged of each team. Any takers?
> (think R&D tax credit status)
>
>
> Paul, using my bully pulpit
>
>
>
>
> _____________________
> Piping Design Central
> [ http://www.PipingDesign.com ]
> ________________________________________
> We hope you find this newsletter useful.
> If not, you can unsubscribe at:
> PipingDesign-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Post message: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: PipingDesign-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Received on Sat Apr 28 21:23:00 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 09 2010 - 00:20:17 EST