RE: Piping Erection

From: <Mandar>
Date: Fri Jun 08 2001 - 06:31:00 EDT

Yes ,
The FW anf FFW should be decided by the fabricator. They are the best judges.

If they are indicated on iso it may be of some help but the excercise will not be efficiently productive.

have a nice time :-)
Mandar

---

Tecnimont Ruwais site
Phone :- 00-971-2-8760077 extn. 214
Fax :- 00-971-2-8760211

~-----Original Message-----
~From: Paul Bowers [mailto:pbowers@pipingdesign.com]
~Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 3:26 AM
~To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=Ez1XG3hPncrX3U8knSVAj0cbG7o8P53xdT-wv3bEPJJ4E916DuyAHGV9W8r7iTxIHrVMOCQKJkECaivD7XyNReZoJwThiA">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
~Subject: [PipingDesign] Piping Erection
~
~
~Just wondering what the general consensus is on this, me not being
~a fab guy.
~
~Should field weld and field-fit welds be indicated on the piping
~isometric (I'm not referring to spool sheets)?
~
~Since it is the piping fabricator who will be installing the
~system, aren't they in a better position to determine where to
~break up the line? I suspect that most effort put into specifying
~FWs and FFWs is wasted.
~
~Paul
~
~
~_____________________
~Piping Design Central
~[ http://www.PipingDesign.com ]
~________________________________________
~We hope you find this newsletter useful.
~If not, you can unsubscribe at:

<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=L6CIbHo_ij_dozTSr5O01jPThJ-eW-hnjG3tw2cHx-nTZpLHPxnrSn_nh9qqTMoVrbIfLOBSXxj6SAW2Kw-IpsTipE7Z--sCnAluZ3i-iDlb">~PipingDesign-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com</a>
~Post message: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=Ez1XG3hPncrX3U8knSVAj0cbG7o8P53xdT-wv3bEPJJ4E916DuyAHGV9W8r7iTxIHrVMOCQKJkECaivD7XyNReZoJwThiA">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
~Subscribe: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=Bj6G1LZvmFyH4kjR8Ty2uJXJE8yndKomB766RmVc-gP91bN1am8eRhxT65__g3dWYFsUcTCqcRRRtZt7nNRAnMNW-KZ56ExK-ooP55RPZZev">PipingDesign-subscribe@yahoogroups.com</a>
~
~Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
~<a href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a>
~
~
Received on Fri Jun 08 06:31:00 2001