> CH12 in R & Y at 12.7 gives some insight but continually cautions you on how
large
>errors can occur.
My Roark is the older version, so I don't know which approach they
suggest. The 'large errors' note tells me it's the WRC 107 approach. If
you're talking about a small diameter, relatively thick pipe, you can use
the appropriate ring formula. There won't be much in the way of errors
because the pipe won't become elliptical. If it's a large diamter thin
wall pipe (say D/t>30) you'll probably have to stiffen it. The nozzle
calculation probably won't do you much good, since you don't have a
nozzle or a branch connection.
Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=IPc8DS8VUVpWea1iL2MdqF6Hk9UC5nnk85EAetSebSGmBOsdQQPA481h7__xdrPUmIm80EO8W2Fk">chrisw@skypoint.com</a> | this distance" (last words of Gen.
___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)<a href="http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw">http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw</a> Received on Thu Jul 31 10:54:00 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:29 EST