Yes, but "spray on" implies (to me, anyway, and please no comments on my
cranial ability to naturally sprout unneeded organic heat-retaining
covering) that stuff that follically-challenged individuals use to cover up
bald spots.
"Spray-in flocculation of adhesive heat insulating material via the controlled, slow movement of a mechanical containing device moving laterally along the surface of a pipe for the eventual purpose of having the solidified flocculant act as an insulating medium" would have been enough for me. But then sometimes I'm a stickler for detail.
Paul
> Hi Paul
>
> it may be a spray/pour on type such as polyurethane (too hot in this
> instance), and I think there was a bit of work done with cementitious
> vermiculite. I have used guns for spraying insulating refractory in
furnaces
> but it makes one helluva mess.
> If you want to guarantee a pipe leak, cover it with non-removeable
> insulation.
>
> So perhaps your troll is not.
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve McKenzie
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Bowers [mailto:pbowers@pipingdesign.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:42 PM
> To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=4NZ9PGnP10u-5B0DCmQiEVlMFbOMMYgyDcIhcM1ZeaQ3IfKqD6TyxQG1kuHAclWyoKWg5oxo_nzsRWAgHHwNsrSlTKE5Bac">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
> Subject: Re: [PipingDesign] High-Temp Piping Insulation
>
>
> > I hear
> > there are paint-on coatings which can serve this purpose and,
> > because it is a coating which bonds to the pipe, it would not be
> > required to be removed for inspection. Any advice/experience will be
> > appreciated.
>
> Paint-on coatings as a replacement for insulation?
>
> I think what we have here folks is a troll.
Received on Thu Oct 09 01:27:00 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:30 EST