I think it would be safer to try W and NE and possibly a more
critical direction as well. Since 10% of the time the direction could
be anything, I would take worse case direction. Sometimes one can
easily tell what direction is more critical for wind by just looking
at the model. If you cannot, you may try X and Z (assuming Y is
vertical) directions and use worse wind case out of these.
It is true that the probability of wind blowing at that speed for a
more critical direction, other than W or NE could be lower, but if
you cannot rule it out or calculate a lower wind speed corresponding
to the lower probabilty for that direction, I would rather use the
same wind speed for all directions and be conservative.
Regards,
Karim Rinawi
- In PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com, zope_tushar@f... wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Friends,
>
> In my current project, the average wind direction is west for 60%
of the
> year and the direction is N-E for 30% of the year.
> Avg wind velocity at 10m elevation is 59 m/s. Max line size is 16"
with
> 100mm insulation.
>
> What is your opinion about the load case for wind?
> I mean do I have to analyse two separate load cases or just West
direction
> case is sufficient.
>
> We are already analysing all lines for X and Z direction seismic
> coefficient of 0.24g (Y being vertical direction)
>
> Best Regards.
>
> Tushar Zope
> Extn: 162
>
>
>
> =======================================================
> Confidentiality Notice
>
> This communication and the information it contains:-
> (a) Is intended for the person(s) or organisation(s) named above
and for no
> other person(s) or organisation(s).
> (b) May be confidential, legally privileged and protected in law.
Unauthorised
> use, copying or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful. If you
have received
> this communication in error, please contact us immediately by email
at
> Postmaster@f...
> =======================================================
Received on Wed Jan 14 17:25:00 2004