Re: Civil Foundation Design for Pipe Support

From: <Hemant>
Date: Mon May 17 2004 - 12:28:00 EDT


Yeah,
I agree with Gordon, In our company too, civil engineers need data in Hydro case, Operating case & empty pipe. They never ask for wind & seismic loads which I presume are taken care my some other means. Bye
Hemant S. Sawnat
UHDE India Ltd
cell : 9820695101
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=qmtQp_cWeknaVDO-uWxH_KSnefluelSp1AIArlvgcgn-DRjF8ythTuSvar_NNdthbV7qvEU6ea85ngH1">apurvamh@vsnl.com</a>

Balakrishnan

  1. You can ALWAYS use the CAESAR outputs as inputs for foundation design.
  2. The design of foundations is a specialist area and your civil engineer
    should give you guidance on what he wants. Our civil engineer prefers to
    see all of our load cases and he combines them as HIS design criteria
    dictate. In general he wants to see two operating cases, one with the
    weight of the pipe and all sustained loads, with the pipe full, and one
    with the pipe empty. I also find that he is generally not interested in
    our wind or seismic loads, he works those out himself. I get the
    impression that civil engineers have different work practices in different
    countries. I recommend you ask your civil engineer what he requires.
    CAESAR can definitely deliver.

Regards,

Gordon Reddek
Specialist Mechanical Engineer
Alcan Engineering, Level 11, 119 Charlotte Street, Brisbane, Qld 4000,
Australia.
Tel: +61 7 3218 3710
Fax: +61 7 3236 0155
Email: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=Oi7pK_QqKHU81NQEzXbQvBgJhW8k_rbqnWWsOLurponF0dP7TSwv_b-6vX3MfDP4iGED3Bq4s5G_UySRRus">gordon.reddek@alcan.com</a>

"Balakrishnan" <balakrishnan@ksrc.com.kw>
16/05/2004 02:55 AM
Please respond to
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=ejZLtYR0yMrYeMOL_5wC5KQAZdUbJHra06JjBV1sAB5uAA2TN2ZAMzHDda9KA2rUWRgh41MHbHQGavfU7lxOB75i55mBQg0">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>

To
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=ejZLtYR0yMrYeMOL_5wC5KQAZdUbJHra06JjBV1sAB5uAA2TN2ZAMzHDda9KA2rUWRgh41MHbHQGavfU7lxOB75i55mBQg0">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
cc

Subject
[PipingDesign] Civil Foundation Design for Pipe Support

Out of the Following 3 cases, which load is MORE realistic in the
Design of Support Foundations?

  1. Static Load (Weight of Pipe,Fittings and Fluid for the given Span)
  2. Maximum Load out of the CAESAR output as listed below:
    1. Sustained Load (Equivalent to case 1 above)
    2. Operating Load
    3. Expansion Load
  3. Maximum Load out of all the Cases above.

In other words,
I wanted to know
whether we can use the CAESAR Load outputs
as an input for Support Foundation Design or not.

With warm regards,

Balakrishnan



PipingOffice - Excel Spreadsheets for Piping Calculations
<a href="http://www.pipingoffice.us/">http://www.pipingoffice.us/</a>


Main site: <a href="http://www.pipingdesign.com">http://www.pipingdesign.com</a>

Yahoo! Groups Links

Notice:
This message and any attachments are the property of Alcan and are
intended solely for the named recipients or entity to whom this message is
addressed. If you have received this message in error please inform the
sender via e-mail and destroy the message. If you are not the intended
recipient you are not allowed to use, copy or disclose the contents or
attachments in whole or in part.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



PipingOffice - Excel Spreadsheets for Piping Calculations
<a href="http://www.pipingoffice.us/">http://www.pipingoffice.us/</a>


Main site: <a href="http://www.pipingdesign.com">http://www.pipingdesign.com</a>

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT


Yahoo! Groups Links

a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PipingDesign/">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PipingDesign/</a>

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=Z_Xemetrj5IYoBI5soFWWVJpyiLQbDDe_HTvOzwBDzhAFzhtI9PUO0v-n-6qujLs-Rk4YplQZz96W4axFgtCAL7wRMlb-J3cZhUcGC-bTs1Vqg">PipingDesign-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com</a>

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Mon May 17 12:28:00 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:34 EST