on steps on using ceaser II
visit www.simsci.com
regards
stanley
-----Original Message-----
From: Paritosh Garg [mailto:pari2dce@vsnl.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 5:51 PM
To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [PipingDesign] How to use Caesar II
Dear Friends,
Could anyone of tell any site or inform about the steps on using Casear II , I mean what all cases have to checked after creating the input file.
Regards
Paritosh
>
> There are 8 messages in this issue.
>
> Topics in this digest:
>
> 1. RE: Hazen William Formula
> From: "ed engalan" <edengalan@hblpipe.com>
> 2. Request
> From: Sri Sai paruchuru <sriparuchuru@yahoo.com>
> 3. Re:
> From: KoechigC@aol.com
> 4. New Current Interesting Link: Piping Design Theory
> From: "Paul Bowers" <pbowers@pipingdesign.com>
> 5. Re: Hazen William Formula
> From: "Paul Bowers" <pbowers@pipingdesign.com>
> 6. BW Y connection standard
> From: Sajit Viswan <sviswan@tebodin.co.om>
> 7. Carbon Transfer Piping - Friction Loss
> From: "Steve McKenzie" <mechproj@xtra.co.nz>
> 8. RE: Carbon Transfer Piping - Friction Loss
> From: "Bruce Bullough" <bbullough@sebesta.com>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:32:49 -0400
> From: "ed engalan" <edengalan@hblpipe.com>
> Subject: RE: Hazen William Formula
>
> cckla,
>
> Like you said, the Hazen William Formula is only used for liquid with
> similar properties as water at standard temperature,
> so if you have a liquid with different viscosity, then this formula is
> not applicable anymore.
>
> I would suggest to use "Darcy-Weisbach-Colebrook Equation". It takes
> pipe roughness and viscosity into consideration, so it's
> more far ranging than any other formula I've used.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> ed
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cckla [mailto:cckla@pd.jaring.my]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:22 AM
> To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PipingDesign] Hazen William Formula
>
>
>
> Dear all specialists,
>
> I understand that Hazen William formula is widely used for liquid with
> similar viscosity as water. If I would like to use this formula to
> estimate the head loss of a pipeline for more viscous liquid, is there
> any changes need to be done on the formula ? Please guide me.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
> cckla
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> =========================================
> PipingOffice - Excel Spreadsheets for Piping Calculations
> http://www.pipingoffice.us/
> =========================================
> Main site: http://www.pipingdesign.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Sri Sai paruchuru <sriparuchuru@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Request
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have more than 6yr experience in piping with various projects.I would
like to know the consultants in USA who can provide me the opportunity.
>
> Regards
> Sri
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:03:28 EDT
> From: KoechigC@aol.com
> Subject: Re:
>
> Yes , it depends on how visous the liquid is, Right?
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:46:54 -0400
> From: "Paul Bowers" <pbowers@pipingdesign.com>
> Subject: New Current Interesting Link: Piping Design Theory
>
> www.pipingdesign.com
>
> "A Piping Tutorial"
>
> (Thanks Shannon)
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:58:21 -0400
> From: "Paul Bowers" <pbowers@pipingdesign.com>
> Subject: Re: Hazen William Formula
>
> > Like you said, the Hazen William Formula is only used for liquid with
> > similar properties as water at standard temperature,
> > so if you have a liquid with different viscosity, then this formula is
> > not applicable anymore.
> >
> > I would suggest to use "Darcy-Weisbach-Colebrook Equation". It takes
> > pipe roughness and viscosity into consideration, so it's
> > more far ranging than any other formula I've used.
>
>
> If you need expert guidance on fluid flow, I suggest you look up Ken at
> http://www.lmnoeng.com/civil.htm
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 07:44:00 +0400
> From: Sajit Viswan <sviswan@tebodin.co.om>
> Subject: BW Y connection standard
>
> Does anyone know of a standard that covers BW Y connection. Such as, B
16.5 having dimensions of flanged Y connections. This is to enable me to
procure the Y branch connection as a fitting instead of having to fabricate.
The 6" full size branch connections are to be used in a gravity flow oil
drain.
>
> Sajit
> "This email message is intended for the named recipient only.It may be
privileged and/or confidential.If you are not the intended named recipient
of this email then you should not copy it or use it for any purpose, nor
disclose its contents to any other person which is strictly prohibited and
unlawful"
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:33:26 -0000
> From: "Steve McKenzie" <mechproj@xtra.co.nz>
> Subject: Carbon Transfer Piping - Friction Loss
>
> Gents+1
>
> this is the second go I have had at this message; the original
> disappeared.
>
> I am designing a small transfer system for granular activated carbon.
> It will be transferred from a ground level hopper to an open tank
> about 5m higher up.
> Intend using water as the conveying medium, and an eductor. The pipe
> will be PE, 63PN8.
> I would expect that the carbon will scrape on the pipe walls, so the
> friction loss calculation is probably an empirical thing.
>
> Has anyone seem any info on friction loss in wet carbon transfer (or
> other granular material) system? A reference would be appreciated.
>
>
> I need this info so I can size/design the eductor, as backpressure is
> one of the major design inputs. If I stuff it up, the hopper will
> overflow and I will have to turn it into a pressure tank system which
> would be a pain. Hence my question.
>
> Thanks
> Cheers
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:54:36 -0500
> From: "Bruce Bullough" <bbullough@sebesta.com>
> Subject: RE: Carbon Transfer Piping - Friction Loss
>
> Steve:
>
> I've done work with GAC and carbon pellets on and off for years. On
> rare occasion I've slurried it. It's been a lot more reliable to
> transfer as a dry solid most of the time, if and when possible. If
> fluidized with air, it moves pretty well and doesn't hang up too bad,
> assuming one uses the right fittings and connectors. Is it possible to
> transport dry?
>
> When I've had to transport carbon in a slurry, the more dilute I could
> make it, the better (to a point) - recycle the water to minimze the cost
> and general "hassle". There ought to be data on friction effect, since
> years ago there was a lot of R&D into coal/water slurries for boiler
> fuel, but I've never looked into it.
>
> ... Bruce D. Bullough ...
> Sebesta Blomberg & Associates, Inc.
> 2381 Rosegate
> Roseville, MN 55113 USA
> + 651-634-7344
> www.sebesta.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve McKenzie [mailto:mechproj@xtra.co.nz]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 3:33 AM
> To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [PipingDesign] Carbon Transfer Piping - Friction Loss
> [bcc][faked-from][bayes]
>
>
> Gents+1
>
> this is the second go I have had at this message; the original
> disappeared.
>
> I am designing a small transfer system for granular activated carbon.
> It will be transferred from a ground level hopper to an open tank about
> 5m higher up.
> Intend using water as the conveying medium, and an eductor. The pipe
> will be PE, 63PN8.
> I would expect that the carbon will scrape on the pipe walls, so the
> friction loss calculation is probably an empirical thing.
>
> Has anyone seem any info on friction loss in wet carbon transfer (or
> other granular material) system? A reference would be appreciated.
>
>
> I need this info so I can size/design the eductor, as backpressure is
> one of the major design inputs. If I stuff it up, the hopper will
> overflow and I will have to turn it into a pressure tank system which
> would be a pain. Hence my question.
>
> Thanks
> Cheers
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> =========================================
> PipingOffice - Excel Spreadsheets for Piping Calculations
> http://www.pipingoffice.us/
> =========================================
> Main site: http://www.pipingdesign.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> =========================================
> PipingOffice - Excel Spreadsheets for Piping Calculations
> http://www.pipingoffice.us/
> =========================================
> Main site: http://www.pipingdesign.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:24:04 EDT