On Sep 13, 2004, at 4:03 PM, Steve McKenzie wrote:
> I expect you are right, but will go through the motions anyway, in
> order
> to avoid winding up in the motions, so to speak.
I'd be real interested in hearing how you fare. I get into this in a
couple of capacities--the design work and as sometime accident
investigator. Wearing the latter hat sometimes comes to commenting on
safety specifications, some of which render actual work almost
impossible, others are hopelessly vague in order to prohibit unsafe
conditions unless supervision needs a free hand in cutting corners to
get product out the door.
Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=2H0fRN9h7rhbSSHPRMbiN44KxnM9u1qxXFHK5ShosM7fBUVoCa-sSly8mK4TZP4wJgJDhQhzVPCXiFC7mCk">chrisw@skypoint.com</a> | this distance" (last words of Gen.
...................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)<a href="http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw">http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw</a> Received on Mon Sep 13 17:22:00 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:36 EST