When I was working in a production environment if I released an iso that did
not have a "field weld" symbol on a weld it was a shop weld, whether the
line had 2 sheets or not. Most software platforms for piping design allow
the option to place a weld as field or shop in the model that will be
extracted onto an iso. We has a spool dept. that would weld up each sheet
individually, then in the final production assembly, before it left our
shop, the weld to connect the two spools would be welded.
-----Original Message-----
From: l_c_y1999 [mailto:l_c_y1999@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 12:16 AM
To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=J-bTK_Ckxnbtz6Y0z8x1Tq3ttj7OKT3DLU1QK1DV-E5S-LIIAqBew0SeMHilNEu2bAg0YBCVVKK3W5agzdp9B9GcOOE">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
Subject: [PipingDesign] Piping spool number and isometric break
Dear member,
Have you ever experienced such probelem like: Isometric has to be broken up (It's a common problem now because Cad software been used widely, how much informaion can be put into one iso is pretty much out of control of human being.) but the inter-iso weld does not need to be a field weld (Shop weld saves some bucks).
And the most Spool ID naming system (sometime called Mark peice No.) consist isometric mumber (i.e 52P122-SHT1-01, 02...), So under all these circumstances I get 2 Spool IDs even though I want the inter- iso weld to be done in shop.
Is this a probelem at all? I mean maybe the shop people wounld be confused and they will fab these two spool and weld then together then ship it to site with 2 SPOOL TAG No. with it?
Or the shop people do get confused?
What's your onpin on this?
Cheers
Robert Liu
<a href="http://www.pipingoffice.us/">http://www.pipingoffice.us/</a> =========================================Main site: <a href="http://www.pipingdesign.com">http://www.pipingdesign.com</a>
Yahoo! Groups Links Received on Wed Oct 20 10:11:00 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:37 EST