If the Italian company is your consortium partner and takes ultimate
responsibility for design of the plant including performance guarantee,
you may rest in peace. However, in case you have to shoulder the
responsibility of performance guarantee then I revert back to my previous
mail. Analyze the system for seismic conditions, pass on the load to
turbine manufacturer and let him decide if same is acceptable. As a quick
reference, you can yourself perform stability check for turbine and have
an idea if your loads are in the acceptable zone.
By the way, IRAN must be in a high seismic zone. I am interested to know what seismic factor you have used in your calculation.
One last thing: as pointed out by Paul, please refrain from off-list communication. The whole idea of piping group would be lost if information is not shared with others.
"a_noorikardar" <a_noorikardar@yahoo.com> 12/02/04 03:58 PM
To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=aUp6rPPPZwoUm6-61iLZQ8A-3-oYwrhJbqLZSq9u86RpoNgrOmqIi2O9-woiEsiI2DojMBXy4bg1yvZshNM3">Pankaj.Mandal@fluor.com</a>
cc:
Subject: occasional load on turbine nozzle
.
Dear sir;
thanks for your attention.
I'm working on petorchmical plant in south of Iran and our partner
in this project is an Italin Co.
in this project we have some compressor& turbine.
I calculte seismic acceleration from UBC code and consider that for
calculating of occasional load on structure and nozzel, and sent
Caesar file to our partner;then they answer to us ; we shall
consider UBC Code for calculation of seismic acceleration and use
this acceleration only for load on support and structure and it is'n
necessrly consider that for load on nozzle during seismic.
I want to know; is it correct?
and in which Code or vendor instruction this matter was written.
also, others company's proceduer is like this not?
best regards
a.noori
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Thu Dec 02 06:41:00 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:38 EST