Re: Dimensioned Isometrics

From: <Dacharaju>
Date: Wed Apr 13 2005 - 04:22:00 EDT

Dear all,

I agree that Isometrics are to be dimensioned. This would also be the basis for developing shop drawings.
I have seen while working with with one of the Petrochemical plants, where consultants have provided them Node numbers and Node-to-Node distance as a table on Isometrics with no information on supports. Working with such Isometrics is definitely painful.
Showing locations/type of supports on Isometric is a good idea, but I have seen difference of practice by different consultants. In addition to the information as indicated by Mr Adolphus, the FIELD WELD locations are also shown by some of the consultants in Engineering phase which are usually verified (changed if required) by the field peronnel. There are cases where Isometrics are developed for lines < 1-1/2", if they are critical process lines. For other small lines (<1-1/2"), usually utilities, a "Guidance" isometric is prepared for the pupose of arriving at required Material Take-off.
With best regards,

D.K.M.Rao.

adolphus.o.omodu@exxonmobil.com
04/13/2005 08:34 AM
Please respond to
PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com

To
PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
cc

Subject
Re: [PipingDesign] Dimensioned Isometrics

Gents,
I decided to respond to this mail as it interestingly coincided with a discussion we had some 4 days ago in my department.

My experience over the years is that piping isos are normally dimensioned although they are not usually drawn to scale. This is why somebody could describe them as rough guides "normally given to pipe fitters". It is also partly because of this "not usually drawn to scale" issue that Piping General Arrangement drawings are very important alongside the Piping Isos.

The benefits that accrue when isos are dimensioned cannot be overemphasized. Someone has already spoken about Piping stress analysis which are often carried out b/w nodes (with defined length/diameter dimensions) created out of isometric drawings. There are several other design issues like Settle-Out pressures in piping downstream of compressors
- where you require pipe lengths and vessel volumes to estimate pressures, instrument tie-in points/locations along plant piping as these often require specified minimum lengths from other fittings for good operation, piping supports locations where you must necessarily indicate distances b/w
adjacent supports for flexibility anlaysis etc.

Just to make the point clearer may i just quote verbatim a piping/layout specification that was required from bidding contractors on a major EPC job
(>$ US 500M) that has been successfully completed in Nigeria by one of the
Oil producing majors (Not MPN).

"Produce a complete set of piping isometrics for all piping other than such
small diameter minor services (generally 11/2" and below). Isometric Sheet should include a full material take - off (MTO) for each drawing c/w piping spools and fitting dimensions. Isometrics shall include hydrostatic test requiremenst, stress relief limits, field welds and insulation thickness, All welded attachment pipe supports shall be shown"

For me, i'll go for dimensioned isometrics anyday.

Hope i have not taken much of your time.

Adolphus Omodu

                       "Steve McKenzie"
                       <Mechproj@xtra.co.nz>          To:
PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
                                                      cc:
                                                      Subject:
[PipingDesign] Dimensioned Isometrics
                       04/07/05 01:32 PM
                       Please respond to
                       PipingDesign







Gents+2
I have just had a friendly discussion with a South African colleague who maintains isos are normally dimensioned and are used as part or the formulation of the Schedule of Quantities; BOM; whatever. My experience with isos is that they are comics that we give to the pipefitters as a rough guide. Occasionally I have used dimensioned isos to display fixed and toleranced dimensions around critical plant for shop spooled piping, but in general I just use them as a sort of road map. We are not talking 3D CAD here.
My question is do you guys normally put dimensions on Isos, and if you do what sort of plant do you normally work with?

Cheers

Steve



PipingOffice - Excel Spreadsheets for Piping Calculations http://www.pipingoffice.us/

Main site: http://www.pipingdesign.com

Yahoo! Groups Links



PipingOffice - Excel Spreadsheets for Piping Calculations http://www.pipingoffice.us/

Main site: http://www.pipingdesign.com

Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PipingDesign/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: PipingDesign-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
------------------

Confidentiality Notice : This e-mail and any attachments are confidential to the addressee and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee of this e-mail, you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way whatsoever. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please e-mail the sender by replying to this message, and delete the original and any print out thereof.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Wed Apr 13 04:22:00 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:24:07 EDT