Paul,
I had this problem once before. We had special nuts manufactured, three times the height of a standard nut, and used these in the middle of the wafer check to join short stud bolts together.
Regards
Dennis Kirk-Burnnand B.E. (Mech)
DENNIS KIRK ENGINEERING
denniskb@ozemail.com.au www.ozemail.com.au/~denniskb
-----Original Message-----
From: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of Paul Bowers
Sent: Saturday, 28 May 2005 8:17 AM
To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [PipingDesign] Bolting and Valve Length Question
Thanks again Steve, good advice even though I'm being a bit flippant and trollish below.
There is a 90 degree elbow directly connected to the flange, so there is possible interference. A scale Autocad drawing makes this obvious, but the "double curve" of the ell makes it hard to tell if things will fit.
Maybe I need FEA software.
Paul
Steve McKenzie wrote:
> Hi Paul
> if you are stuck for space, there is a type of valve that may help. It
> is used as the main isolator on some steam turbines and functions as a
> (swing) check and an isolator in one. It looks a bit like a tilt check
> with a screwed shaft that forces the disc onto its seat. Often called
> CIES (combined isolating and emergency stop) valve.
> However it wont help if the purpose of the gate is maintenance isolation
> for the check.
> You don't need through bolts to do what you intend; just bolt through
> one side of the gate, bridge the check and bolt up to the pipe flange.
> You should have enough space for that as you only need nut depth plus
> washer plus a few thread turns on each of the gate flange bolt holes.
> The check will not last very well though, as it will see the turbulence
> from the gate trim.
--
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PipingDesign/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
PipingDesign-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Fri May 27 20:59:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:24:07 EDT