sandeep.bansal@simonindia.com wrote:
> Dear Paul,
>
> You seems to be quit depressed with the performance of Automatic
> isometrics generations facility of 3D softwares.
> But its not correct. I have used ISOGEN (the engine used in every other 3D
> package) and if configured properly no one can even find out whether the
> isometric is generated manually or through software. Yes I agree that it
> has some drawbacks but very minor and an alternate can always be found
> out.
Perhaps I have only seen poorly-extracted isometrics then, and some of them are acceptable. But others are absolutely ridiculous (too bad I can't provide an example - I'll see if I can find one next week).
Care to provide some tips on generating decent isos outputted by Isogen? I don't think I've ever seen a write-up on this and if you want to write a short article I'll feature it at the website.
Paul Received on Thu Jun 23 21:03:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:24:07 EDT