Re: GRP

From: <Steve>
Date: Fri Feb 17 2006 - 04:44:00 EST

That USACE report was quite a good read.

It shows the pig ignorance often exhibited when dealing with GRP. GRP has many different formulations and comparing GRP to steel is a bit like comparing fish to beefsteak.

A fairer comparison would be to compare GRP to metal pipe.

GRP is a good material; they make planes out of it.

Unfortunately it is a difficult material to design, select, specify and fabricate.

The majority of failure can be attributed to faulty design or fabrication.

I still use GRP for large ducting as it is cost effective in corrosive environments at moderate temeratures and stresses can be kept to conservativew levels.

But to use it for a condensate return system is asking for trouble even using a vinyl ester resin. With a polyester, you dont stand a chance.
I use a bit of GRP pipe for handling hot fluosilicic acid solutions but much prefer to use a straight plastic (PP in this instance) pipe as soon as conditions permit.

Fatigue is a big issue with composites and it is seldom dealt with in the level of detail required (apart from aircraft - I hope).

Because GRP is nowhere near as well understood as, say, steels or thermoplastics, it is a good idea to be very wary of it in situations where generous design/safety factors are not appropriate.

Its a great material, but there arent that many people around who know how to use it to its full advantage. Salesmen will probably disagree unless they are flogging metallics or thermoplastics.

Cheers

Steve

Received on Fri Feb 17 04:44:00 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:24:10 EDT