Re: Re: Hydrotest vs pneumatic test (Things That Go Boom continue)

From: <Christopher>
Date: Mon Apr 10 2006 - 23:34:00 EDT

On Apr 10, 2006, at 4:28 AM, tomcruz55 wrote:

> basically if there is a safety procedure governing its use and
> trained personnel are available - then go for it.

So you're telling us you've got the safety procedures all documented and you've had 3 ruptures anyway. Looks like your procedures need some work.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=bVCDNccOnaOGfX3l-KNkqGAJSBn3zh448RudwfHpo30grftjQpV0EvSTrNTPw-7Br4w8sO9tlz_M">chrisw@skypoint.com</a> | this distance" (last words of Gen.

.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania

1864)
<a href="http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw/">http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw/</a> Received on Mon Apr 10 23:34:00 2006