We are right Paul, USA terminologywise.
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=h7HsSBxZkBXBCAR1PGlx6z1XbjfxtWlujNXKdRjD1zX8LlMTQ70eWq2bJy88lQ9K7W8bMvDHTd_j2u1MEhnnwi-0dlR_XA">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> [mailto:<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=h7HsSBxZkBXBCAR1PGlx6z1XbjfxtWlujNXKdRjD1zX8LlMTQ70eWq2bJy88lQ9K7W8bMvDHTd_j2u1MEhnnwi-0dlR_XA">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>]On
Behalf Of Paul Bowers
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 11:43 PM
To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=h7HsSBxZkBXBCAR1PGlx6z1XbjfxtWlujNXKdRjD1zX8LlMTQ70eWq2bJy88lQ9K7W8bMvDHTd_j2u1MEhnnwi-0dlR_XA">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
Subject: Re: [PipingDesign] Re: minimum pipe spool length
Anton wrote:
> I'm not trying to be smart here, but wouldn't the minimum possible
> pipe spool length for a butt welded end connection be none., ie.,
> fitting to fitting?
What about the root gap? Seriously, though...
Also, Ed said:
<<When you say spool, I would interpret it as a straight piece of pipe with flanges each end.>>
I'm probably wrong, terminology-wise, but I've always used the term "spool piece" to mean a short length of BE pipe between flanges. Some call this a pup piece.
Paul
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Tue Jan 09 08:56:00 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:48 EST