Re: Amount of piping

Rick:

If none of Chris's issues were issues, your question makes no sense. It appears that you are asking for information on a process that converts carbon and hydrogen to nitrogen. Although on the very fringe of atomic physics it might be possible, one would actually want to go the other way, as there is fuel value in both carbon and hydrogen, and none in nitrogen.

However, I could twist your request around and assume that you are talking about a thermal oxidizer with a scrubber to remove sulfur and other common petroleum impurities, and then there is no "typical".

... Bruce D. Bullough ...
Lead Process Engineer
Foth Production Systems, LLC
8550 Hudson Boulevard North, Suite 100
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Direct: +651-288-8598 Fax: +651-288-8551 http://www.foth.com

IMPORTANT NOTICE
This communication including any attachments, (E-mail) is confidential and may be proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, permanently delete this E-mail from your system and destroy any copies. Any use of the E-mail, including disclosure, distribution or replication, by someone other than its intended recipient is prohibited.

This E-mail has the potential to have been altered or corrupted due to transmission or conversion. It may not be appropriate to rely upon this E-mail in the same manner as hard copy materials bearing the author's original signature or seal.

Christopher Wright <chrisw@skypoint.com> Sent by: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
04/04/2007 10:49 AM
Please respond to
PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com

To
PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
cc

Subject
Re: [PipingDesign] Amount of piping

On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:15 AM, RICK wrote:

> Could you help me? I need a typical P&ID for a gas treatment
> facility. I am talking of a facility composed of a burner and a
> scrubber to treat petroleum vapor with a flow rate of 45000Nm3/hr
> and convert it to nitrogen.

I shouldn't need to say this, but you're asking someone else to

1. Do your work for you for free.
2. Steal property of his own firm or that of a client
3. Aid or abet incompetence
4. Possibly act against his own employer's interest

All of these are either illegal or unethical, not to mention rather stupid--because you imagine you'd be able to get away with presenting someone else's work as your own.

Don't do this again if you want to remain on the list. Last warning

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at chrisw@skypoint.com | this distance" (last words of Gen.

.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania