RE: Steam Trap Bypass Line

From: <ranjit>
Date: Mon Nov 05 2007 - 14:31:00 EST

The requirement of internal coating may be due to the corrosive nature of the service fluid (crude oil with water) and not piggability. Regards,
Ranjit Ramanan.
KNPC-Kuwait

To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.comFrom: sabzalian2004@yahoo.caDate: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 02:43:35 -0500Subject: Re: [PipingDesign] Steam Trap Bypass Line

HiBased on my experience I have never heard that before and generally it does not need to use coating when pigging>MAIL MUG <melvin_magbanua@yahoo.com> wrote:I have a question my dear colleagues regarding some confusion for applying internal coating in a Piggable line.Is it recommended, say for a 20" NPS C.S. Std W.T. crude oil transmission pipeline to be coated internally (say Phenolic epoxy) when it is designed to be piggable? I need to hear from you guys if you have encountered the similar issue in the past?Thanking you guys in advance for whatever info you can

share.MailSAC-PNZ__________________________________________________Do You

Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <a href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a> [Non-text portions of this message have been

removed]---------------------------------Be smarter than spam. See how smart

SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

---

Get the new Windows Live Messenger!
<a href="http://get.live.com/messenger/overview">http://get.live.com/messenger/overview</a>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Mon Nov 05 14:31:00 2007