The most common cause for Caesar II having a convergence problem is
when it finds a friction factor at a sliding support and it calculates
that there is no load on the support during operating conditions. C2
then cannot reconcile there not being a weight to use in calculating
the sliding friction so it will not converge.
Remove your friction coefficients and rerun. Look for supports with
no loading. Replace the friction coefficients except at the points
where there is no loading.
Have fun.
- In PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com, "Naha, Jaydeep SPEL-ME"
<Jaydeep.Naha@...> wrote:
>
> Mohsen,
>
> From the limited data that you have shared, I understand that your
> solution (when you run the stress analysis) is not converging.
> This could happen because of an introduction of a non-linearity in the
> system, by dint of which the matrices do not converge. There might be a
> case of a guide with a gap and its combination of wind loading or
> seismic loading. There could also be cases of a combination of a
> friction support with any of the occassional load cases.
>
> I would suggest, you run the analysis again, without friction. It should
> easily converge at a single solution, because you would effectively
> provide the system with just enough variables so as to make the same a
> "determinate" one. The boundary conditions need not be altered at this
> stage. If you are lucky enough to use the Power Piping code (ASME
> B31.1), you need to reintroduce the friction for your reports. I would,
> however, suggest re-introducing the same to check for the frictional
> effects - only for the forces arising there, with respect to the local
> design at those points.
>
> With best regards,
> Jaydeep Naha
>
> Senior Manager - Mechanical Engineering Dept.
> Group Leader - Stress Analysis, Projects & Detailed Design
>
> SIEMENS AG (Power Engg. Ltd.)
> Email : Jaydeep.Naha@...
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=Kv5_k6oF6Jrik27PzTmPiiPAX7I95FCWpkt7P2lKqWJ3yMUBZ5209WBvSgyH5HK0lO_O49fiCA8zB0GmlhdwGjVD5Q">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> [mailto:<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=Kv5_k6oF6Jrik27PzTmPiiPAX7I95FCWpkt7P2lKqWJ3yMUBZ5209WBvSgyH5HK0lO_O49fiCA8zB0GmlhdwGjVD5Q">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>]
> On Behalf Of mohsen sabzalian
> Sent: Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 09:46
> To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=eYCVQAme65CMFEX-e5mWg0XRGRuWrEiisPRqtsnEoOFO6VldTtuRNzNkgR6eKFFBbmDVvYIzcQx3rM3mZwT4vi7C9RbPgw">pipingdesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
> Subject: [PipingDesign] Caesar
>
>
>
> Hi and good morning
> I would appreciate if some one could advise me on what possibilties one
> meets diverging condition when calculating stress analysis of a program
> by CAESAR II.I am doing stress analyis over a medium pressure steam line
> and should designate the dimension of required loops to avoid any
> overstress condition.I enetered Caesar Software the avilable data of
> line and started to run the program but could not achieve the answer.I
> have studied the user guide but could not find the cause yet .Would you
> advise based on your repeatedly applying the CAESAR the probable problem
> which has resulted to this condition.I would like your comment how to go
> to converging and get good running of CAESAR.
>
> Regards
> Mohsen
>
> ---------------------------------
> Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to
> Yahoo! Answers.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Received on Mon Dec 10 13:38:00 2007