Thanks Chris,
Good example of the potential for misunderstandings and the limitations
of e-mail. I have made an assumption that I understood the context of
the question. Clearly there are many possible applications of the term
"transition piece". Emphasises the importance of giving some background
to the question to get the best responses. The lesson for me is to
request some clarity if needed before responding.
Richard B
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=OqNc3mi1Nq5N3nFcF08_c1CFbeIQbwdIoOe7HnAXjy1F80usEtT4N6aa4mH7BhMOiZgoYjNY7sZzdfmsCQhtjhRwzb4">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> [mailto:<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=OqNc3mi1Nq5N3nFcF08_c1CFbeIQbwdIoOe7HnAXjy1F80usEtT4N6aa4mH7BhMOiZgoYjNY7sZzdfmsCQhtjhRwzb4">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>]
On Behalf Of Christopher Wright
Sent: January 4, 2008 10:57 AM
To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=OqNc3mi1Nq5N3nFcF08_c1CFbeIQbwdIoOe7HnAXjy1F80usEtT4N6aa4mH7BhMOiZgoYjNY7sZzdfmsCQhtjhRwzb4">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
Subject: Re: [PipingDesign] TRANSITION PIECE
On Jan 4, 2008, at 1:27 AM, Richard Beale wrote:
> For example, let's say that we have to connect NPS 4 sch 80 BW and
> NPS 4 sch 40 BW fittings or pipe. A piece of NPS 4 sch 80 is cut
> and taperbored at one end to sch 40.
In this particular case Section VIII Div 1 mandates a taper of 3:1.
It's made to avoid high peak stress.
Out of curiosity I did a Google search on 'transition piece' AND piping and got 4700 hits, more or less. Turns out there are lot of things called transition pieces. Some are reducers going from one diameter to another and others for attaching a run of round ducting to a run of rectangular duct work. Some transitions are for structural purposes like the 3:1 taper, but most of the hits I got seemed to address transitions that attempt to reduce flow restriction. Here's a cool example of FEA applied to a transition <http://www.pipingte <http://www.pipingtech.com/technical/tech6/fea.htm> ch.com/technical/tech6/fea.htm>
Maybe the original questioner would favor us with an actual explanation of what he's talking about.
Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at chrisw@skypoint. <mailto:chrisw%40skypoint.com> com | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania1864)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Fri Jan 04 13:24:00 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:53 EST