RE: regarding CPVC pipes

From: <Steve>
Date: Mon Jan 07 2008 - 04:42:00 EST


Hi there

The duty you describe is a fairly agressive one, and one which is prone to misoperation. The blowdown tank will be fitted with water sprays to condense the flash steam and cool the blowdown to a level suitable for drainage. Trouble can start if, for example, there is insufficient spray water and blowdown is called for to control a drum water level excursion. Then, the blowdown tank drain can be subjected to the flash steam temperature instead of the cooled blowdown temperature.
I have seen CPVC used in an application similar to the one you describe, and it was/is badly buckled but still operating (serving a battery of 10 bar saturated steam boilers). Not sure of the cause but the boiler operators said it was due to occasional hot discharges. Unless the flash temperature is lower than the allowable temp for CPVC and adequate expansion provision is made, I would be looking for a material with higher temperature rating and appropriate corrosion resistance. Alternatively it may be cheaper to arrange a backup blowdown tank spray water supply. In any case I would probably not bury the line - a pipe duct would be more appropriate as the duty is severe and periodic repairs and maintenance are likely to be required.
Cheers

Steve

To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.comFrom: ashok_yargol2000@yahoo.comDate: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:20:14 +0000Subject: [PipingDesign] regarding CPVC pipes

in a powerplant we have blowndown tank normally consists of condensate from boiler and from that blowndown tank i want to use CPVC pipe , this pipe runs underground and gets connected to another tank.now my question is can we use CPVC pipe other than any CS pipe



Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™. <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_012008">http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_Medi\ aCtr_bigscreen_012008</a>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Mon Jan 07 04:42:00 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:53 EST