RE: Effect of non-recommended up/downstream distances on flowmeter accuracy

From: <Steve>
Date: Sat Feb 23 2008 - 02:51:00 EST

Hell yes Paul
Where you bin?
Forget the LHC, last I heard its due to fire up this year so it should be going in 5 or so. Its the ILC and the ITER fusion reactor you should be looking out for, and they have both had budget cuts. So I guess the answer to your question is that it depends on how long the non-war in Iraq lasts. You are no doubt pleased to know that according to New Scientist the LHC offers the slim possibility of time travel. It will be indispensible for fixing all those nasty drawing errors that slipped through and got built. The only catch is that the mistakes have to be made after the date of construction of the first time machine (to keep the logicians happy). So I'm fairly much buggered. So its back to the secret flow bench for me. By the way this is strictly confidential - dont make me get into the time machine with a blunt object and your address.

Cheers

Steve McKenzie

To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.comFrom: pbowers@pipingdesign.comDate: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:21:15 -0700Subject: Re: [PipingDesign] Effect of non-recommended up/downstream distances on flowmeter accuracy

Steve McKenzie wrote:> The flow straighters described by Paul are members of the group called flow conditioners...Oh great, so now we have some super-sekrit, cool-named underground gang doing flow experiments.When does the hadron collider finally start up? Last I heard the problem was regarding eccentric reducers and which side was supposed to be down.http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=502Paul



Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live. http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Sat Feb 23 02:51:00 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:24:15 EDT