Re: Effect of non-recommended up/downstream distances on flowmeter accuracy

From: <Paul>
Date: Sat Feb 23 2008 - 04:27:00 EST

Steve McKenzie wrote:
> Paul
>
> that last email was a reply to your previous off-list email. Your "reply-to"
appears to wind up as a posting. That said, I retract the statement about dog turd and substitute the expression canine fecal matter. In the meantime Ill reread my email etiquette 101 notes.
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve

Well, at least "canine fecal matter" is more easily polished, wanker.

Prost,

Paul Received on Sat Feb 23 04:27:00 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:24:15 EDT