Initial safety issues are addressed via the PFD, since, at that point, everyone knows which products/processes are involved. Or am I confusing with HAZOP?
Paul
> i stand corrected. but once issued, u just work out with the two
process
> safety inforamtion. the distinction becomes irrelevant.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mandar Apte (Ruwais Site - ENG)
[mailto:A.Mandar@TECNIMONT.CO.AE]
> Sent: 24 May, 2001 9:48 AM
> To: 'PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [PipingDesign] P&ID
>
>
> PFD is not the companion of P&ID.
> It's the predessesor of P&ID's
>
> have a nice time :-)
> Mandar
> ~-----Original Message-----
> ~From: SARE, RALPH H. [mailto:SARERH@YANPET.SABIC.com]
> ~Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 9:18 AM
> ~To: 'PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com'
> ~Subject: RE: [PipingDesign] P&ID
> ~
> ~
> ~the first is correct. Its piping and instrument diagrams (same
> ~term use by
> ~Becthel, FlourDaniel, ABB Lummus, etc who built our plant
> ~complex). its the
> ~diagram showing the flow, line and equipment number number,
> ~normal process
> ~condition and instrument setting. Its companion is PFD -
process flow
> ~diagram. its an overview of the process. Much like a P&ID minus
the
> ~instrumentation and spool number.
> ~
> ~-----Original Message-----
> ~From: Goh Kenrick [mailto:kenrickgoh@hotmail.com]
> ~Sent: 23 May, 2001 11:26 AM
> ~To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
> ~Subject: [PipingDesign] P&ID
> ~
> ~
> ~What does P&ID stand for? From what I know and after refering
> ~to piping
> ~handbook, it stand for piping and instrument Diagrams. But a
> ~search on the
> ~website, says that it stand for process and instrument
> ~diagram. Now I am
> ~all confused. Can someone out there tell me exactly what P&ID
> ~stand for?
> ~
> ~Thanks
> ~
> ~Kenrick
Received on Sat May 26 01:18:00 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:23:53 EDT