Re: P&ID

From: <alsharif@bushnak.com>
Date: Sat May 26 2001 - 10:09:00 EDT

Why dou you have to be so offensive? You just called me a retard, and my question rubbish, but didn't explain what was wrong with what I said, except repeating my words with exclamation marks.

What is it that made me retard? Saying that a P&ID doeasn't show supports, elbows or routing? Was I supposed to say it does?

I admit I am new (and I said that before on this list), and I was just trying to express my opinion on the issue realizing I could be wrong. I did not expect this.

All I was trying to say that The P&ID doesn't help me much when it comes to piping. It doesn't help me in calculating pumping requirements, because it doesn't tell me the pipe lengths or routing, and some of the fittings that I need to know about to calculate pressure drops. And it doesn't help me in pipe stress calculations. But it tells me alot of (if not all) what I need to know about the process. So why should it be called a piping and instrumentation diagram if it doesn't tell me much about piping? If I want to understand the piping system I don't look for a P&ID, but if I want to understand the process I do look for the P&ID; so what should it be called? And realizing I'm new and could have missed something in my reasoning, I tried not to be very assertive and asked what others think.

So as you can see, this is the poor retarded mental process that somehow found it's way from the dump yard to Mr Littleford's exalted computer.

This kind of attitude does not encourage discussion, especially for newcomers like me.

By the way, for some reason I feel the logic seems to depend on what industry you're in. So, for the record, I work in seawater desalination, mostly reverse osmosis.

S.F. Al-Sharif

Received on Sat May 26 10:09:00 2001

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:23:53 EDT