Re: Flattening limits for pipes

From: <alvinem1990>
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 12:42:00 EDT


Somehow this thread is bothering me and allow me to limit my reply to the subject on cryogenics.

  1. We need experts. Cryogenics, especially combustible medium, such as ethylene, oxygen, hydrogen, etc, needs non-spark materials. Not all SS304s are suitable for this. What about aluminum? Polyurethane may not be right as well, have we looked in cellular glass (medium being combustible)? Are flanged connections permissible? This is the job of the experts. This information, as Tanmoy wrote and I agree with him on this, can be more available to companies dealing with cryogenics as part of their standard procedure. Even with the vast availability of information in the internet, I find it difficult to get the right info. Just the way it is, our industry may be going down the tube (pun intended) not due to lack of experts, but by companies trying to save money by giving the burden to newbies without proper guidance. (God, Allah, Yahweh, as the case maybe, save us.)
  2. Is it the moderators job to police what we write in this discussion group? Or are we responsible for the info that we give? And Pete, you're right about some of the type of questions in this forum? But you see, they have nowhere to go. Bottomline: Who should be responsible, the giver or the receiver? When ever infomation are handed in or out, review them.

Regards,

Received on Thu Jun 30 12:42:00 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:42 EST