RE: For cooling waters and Sea water it is better to use FRP pipe

From: <Conner>
Date: Tue Jul 12 2005 - 08:49:00 EDT


All pipes of course must be designed for all aspects of exposure, including suitability for available handling, joining, and installation qualities, adequate strengths ands safety factors in all directions for all manners of expected service loadings (including internal and external pressures, intentional or incidental beam loadings, thrust restraint etc.), damage resistance, temperatures involved and effects of same, as well as internal and external corrosion resistances, permeation issues when applicable etc. While I think the claim below of "with out any maintenance" is a quite lofty goal in universal practical application, the capabilities and durability of say coated and lined steel or ductile iron piping and their joining systems are generally well-known and appreciated, compared in some cases to less proven alternatives. Where maintenance (say damage repair or other?) is needed, these metallic pipes can also generally be rather expeditiously repaired with available methods and devices as well.
Randy Conner

-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=JbEViQS-nNH3aKqrxzF32DSRHld1Z_Mjtes9ecQbX5OM55XT8jWGRXpPs2Byj0dW0Xxz_-tYMxUEfsGkD7rpTQModw">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> [mailto:PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Sadath Khan Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:10 AM
To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=JbEViQS-nNH3aKqrxzF32DSRHld1Z_Mjtes9ecQbX5OM55XT8jWGRXpPs2Byj0dW0Xxz_-tYMxUEfsGkD7rpTQModw">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> Subject: [PipingDesign] For cooling waters and Sea water it is better to use FRP pipe

Dear All
Please note that for cooling and sea waters of Refinereis it is better to use FRP piping systems as they are non corrsoive and provides longer service life with out any maintance
AWWA C-950 and M 45, BS5480, and ASME B 31.3 codes support these non mettalic pipes
above is for your information
Regards
SADATH Rakesh Patil <rpa@lntenc.com> wrote: 68" CS pipes must be available. we also used 64" CS Pipes during our - Refinary Expansion Project and it was for Cooling Water Lines that runs underground.

do you need for the same purpose?

regards,
rakesh

<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=WYzkG55Q5SxTr7-qO7FkQVLOjUiJb92RhfQua0NrJ56qpMlSY0cqu_xAlj_ITrm546f2qbWd2k2aCitgIOro">Tushar.Zope@linde-le.com</a> Sent by: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=JbEViQS-nNH3aKqrxzF32DSRHld1Z_Mjtes9ecQbX5OM55XT8jWGRXpPs2Byj0dW0Xxz_-tYMxUEfsGkD7rpTQModw">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> 07/11/2005 09:05 AM
Please respond to
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=JbEViQS-nNH3aKqrxzF32DSRHld1Z_Mjtes9ecQbX5OM55XT8jWGRXpPs2Byj0dW0Xxz_-tYMxUEfsGkD7rpTQModw">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>

To
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=JbEViQS-nNH3aKqrxzF32DSRHld1Z_Mjtes9ecQbX5OM55XT8jWGRXpPs2Byj0dW0Xxz_-tYMxUEfsGkD7rpTQModw">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> cc

Subject
Re: [PipingDesign] 68" pipe

Please specify the fluid to be handles and Pr/Temp. of the service.

Then only some suggestion can be given.
How ever such big sizes are generally used with cement pipes, CS+cement lined, only CS, or FRP pipes.

With best regards.

Tushar Zope
Linde Process Technologies India Ltd,
Baroda, India 390 007

_________Confidentiality Notice_______________________
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error, and that any use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing, retention or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return this e-mail to the sender and delete the e-mail from your system. Thank you. Received on Tue Jul 12 08:49:00 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:42 EST