To add. Is the support selection proper. Have all the constraints
(surges, pressure thrusts, etc.) taken care while selecting support
locations and type. Stress analysis should come after that.
Tanmoy
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=PVHdu8491P_emn0zI9OUm39whEDJT_D2usfCiGaFoz4cOIl9bUcGKfLJzwnNvxG7R8H3qFuzcMr5Xi1ticae1oGScPagnG4">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> [mailto:<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=PVHdu8491P_emn0zI9OUm39whEDJT_D2usfCiGaFoz4cOIl9bUcGKfLJzwnNvxG7R8H3qFuzcMr5Xi1ticae1oGScPagnG4">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>]
On Behalf Of Christopher Wright
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 4:55 PM
To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=PVHdu8491P_emn0zI9OUm39whEDJT_D2usfCiGaFoz4cOIl9bUcGKfLJzwnNvxG7R8H3qFuzcMr5Xi1ticae1oGScPagnG4">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
Subject: Re: [PipingDesign] cross country pipe line routing
On Jul 12, 2005, at 12:28 AM, Arief Agung wrote:
> I think, if the stress analysis already performed and the result is
> safe. Everything is OK, right?
Not meaning to slander anyone, but everything is OK if the analysis is
done properly. You should go over the work and make sure that the
assumptions mirror reality: Supports not too stiff and located
accurately; line expansion doesn't violate any continuity conditions,
loads statically consistent with assumed support conditions;
calculation model consistent with as built construction.
Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=6Bahdl5Cv3RktFuQbbh9UWsh3ah7TVz9oOtIbFgOY_FFCyedk529lgQfQNj8Tz9T7LzfW3ijXcyOQA">chrisw@skypoint.com</a> | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania1864)
Yahoo! Groups Links Received on Tue Jul 12 09:02:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:42 EST