Diversions and specially mails from Christopher keep this Forum Alive. Hence little diversions do not do any harm as long as it is not hurting any one's sentiments
Cheers
Siva
-----Original Message-----
From: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
Tushar.Zope@linde-le.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:56 AM
To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [New Sender-Check validity] - Re: [PipingDesign] Liberal
Allowable Stress - Message is from an unknown sender
Dear Friends,
Don't divert the topic to Saddam and US etc etc. It's a pity of our group
that many times such diversions take place in spite of reminders from the
moderator.
If anybody do not want to answer, don't but do not divert the discussions
to such internationally hot topics.
Liberal Allowable Stress: (Reference: Caesar II Tech. material)
A conservative formulation of the allowable expansion stress range for
many codes in CAESAR II is calculated from:
f ( 1.25 Sc + .25 Sh )
When the user requests that the "Liberal Allowable" be used, the
difference between Sh and Sl, provided Sh > Sl, will be added to the term
inside the parenthesis, i.e.
SA(Liberal) = f[ 1.25 Sc + .25 Sh + ( Sh - Sl) ]
The liberal expression will only be employed when there is at least one
sustained stress case in the load set. If there is more than one sustained
stress case in a single problem, then the largest of Sl, considering all
of the sustained cases, for any single element end will be chosen to
subtract from Sh. Because the sustained stress varies from one pipe to
another, the allowable expansion stress will also vary.
With best regards.
Tushar Zope
Linde, India
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Links Received on Tue Aug 23 01:34:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 27 2008 - 20:24:08 EDT