On Aug 29, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Tony Paulin wrote:
> You would roughly have to double the hydrotest pressure to produce a
> boundary failure (longitudinal fishmouth opening) in the cylinder,
> although
> actual values are a bit higher.
I think this is the result of strain hardening. The PVRC has some
really good papers on the topic.
In theory you'd approach the yield point in a hydrotest if you had an
infinite cylinder made from annealed 304 stainless, but 304 strain
hardens hugely, so there's no chance of burst, and the presence of
heads tends to suppress objectionable plastic deformation. You don't
want to go much over the Code-specified proof factors for stainless,
though, because you stand to get enough plastic deformation so things
don't fit together like they should.
Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=0gptwxyZ7ATgOYsI8UiOapSuZMe_DWXXGhb5KK5qCi-5BhgHeP3XHaGxiJfiVE4iKaiJw2E1ucT_uobxLaE">chrisw@skypoint.com</a> | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania1864)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:43 EST