Hi Geoff
Cant find your original question, but am concerned a client may be
trying to sway your judgement.
If you have a coded system, then they/local authority must be able to
produce the validating documentation. If you cant, then the system
coding stamps/tags are worth jack. You may not even know the corrosion
allowance, and if you don’t, there is no record of serviceability
limits.
If you have a non coded system then you may be able to apply some
judgement: In the 60's, a lot of gear was pressure rated as "non shock".
If there was an anticipated shock pressure, then this was added to the
operating pressure to arrive at the basic design pressure before
correcting for temperature etc.
A test of 1.5 times max was almost standard (even outside the good ole
US of A, Chris) and 10% overpressure was generally accpeted as the
"margin".
While this approach worked about 95% of the time, the flaw is obvious in
that no allowance is made for fatigue/endurance limit often being lower
than yield/proof stress.
In occasional surge systems, few problems. In power hydraulics, heaps of
problems, although oddly enough we still use (new) burst pressure as the
benchmark.
In a non coded system, I think that a maximum occasional pressure
excursion of up to 10% over design is unlikely to cause a problem. More
than this and I would be looking at a few SN charts and material specs.
50% over design and forget it as you are outside the designers wildest
dreams. A reverse engineer may be on the cards if the replacement cost
is truly high.; have done this on a few hydro power station penstocks,
but judgement( in the matter of residual strength), alas, has far more
importance than calculation.
Don’t put your nuts on the block because your client doesnt keep good records.
Cheers
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=gglDO13je5tH7zoFAXHY80rKoCp6OHt0XZh3GmB0Dj04G34Q9t293jWQdi36ZHykX_IcLz7BxeXFblkP9fxGvovnxw">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> [mailto:<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=gglDO13je5tH7zoFAXHY80rKoCp6OHt0XZh3GmB0Dj04G34Q9t293jWQdi36ZHykX_IcLz7BxeXFblkP9fxGvovnxw">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>]
On Behalf Of John Luf
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 4:28 PM
To: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=gglDO13je5tH7zoFAXHY80rKoCp6OHt0XZh3GmB0Dj04G34Q9t293jWQdi36ZHykX_IcLz7BxeXFblkP9fxGvovnxw">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>
Subject: Re: [PipingDesign] Fram Lewis Filters
no ASME plate...
well it might have been cooked up by some long dead guy based on one code or another... it might be able to take a limited surge above what its stamped but on the other hand it may actually have less metal in place now then when it was put in service...
I have more maybes than certainties... guess that means go by the name plate...
Going to sleep on it for now!!!
John C. Luf
In the Great Lakes of the U.S.A. and not in Neudorfl... master of unimportant trivia, free agent!
<a href="http://www.pipingoffice.us/">http://www.pipingoffice.us/</a> =========================================Main site: <a href="http://www.pipingdesign.com">http://www.pipingdesign.com</a>
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/150 - Release Date:
10/27/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/150 - Release Date:
10/27/2005
Received on Fri Oct 28 06:51:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 04 2008 - 11:40:45 EST