(no subject)

From: <Dacharaju>
Date: Tue Mar 20 2007 - 00:54:00 EDT

Mr Imran,
There was a discussion on the subject in this forum previously. Just look at the archives.

Mr Ramar...
The subject is not related to just branch fitting. STUB IN suggestion can't be applied here.
regards,
D.K.M.Rao.

ramar karuppaiah <ramarkaruppaiah@yahoo.co.in> Sent by: <a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=hQ4gbn1ECFI4JoPcrgYrwE1IC__wNLNFDvPsk4hJTztjvaeVUJ8KW0FKXmAj_9MT3ukPaNjEiBIr6Oj56tRbi7VUiSrjCk8">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> 03/19/2007 01:07 PM
Please respond to
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=hQ4gbn1ECFI4JoPcrgYrwE1IC__wNLNFDvPsk4hJTztjvaeVUJ8KW0FKXmAj_9MT3ukPaNjEiBIr6Oj56tRbi7VUiSrjCk8">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a>

To
<a href="/group/PipingDesign/post?postID=hQ4gbn1ECFI4JoPcrgYrwE1IC__wNLNFDvPsk4hJTztjvaeVUJ8KW0FKXmAj_9MT3ukPaNjEiBIr6Oj56tRbi7VUiSrjCk8">PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com</a> cc

Subject
Re: [PipingDesign]

insted of using socketweld for 2" u can weld as 'STUB IN" JUST LIK FILLET WELD.But it not advisable for high pressure line.

with regards

• Imran M Ahmed <imahmed@qchem.com.qa> wrote:

> Hello
>
>
>
> The common industry practice is to use socket weld
> fitting for pipe sizes up to 1½" and butt weld
> fittings for 2" and larger sizes. Do you see any
> advantage (i.e. cost of material or ease of
> fabrication etc.) if we use 2" socket weld fitting
> instead of butt weld?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Imran Ahmed
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>

---

Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new <a href="http://in.answers.yahoo.com/">http://in.answers.yahoo.com/</a>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------\
------------------

Confidentiality Notice : This e-mail and any attachments are confidential to the addressee and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee of this e-mail, you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any way whatsoever. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please e-mail the sender by replying to this message, and delete the original and any print out thereof.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Received on Tue Mar 20 00:54:00 2007