On Jan 29, 2008, at 8:13 AM, sviswan@technip.com wrote:
> If you have not used Excel or any other spreadsheet, I would say,
> it is
> worth experimenting. Excel is not difficult to learn, one can learn
> it in
> about a weeks time, by self.
I've been using Excel for engineering calculations for about 20 years
and a VisiCalc clone for 3 years before that. It's not only worth
experimenting with, Excel (or any spreadsheet) is an extremely useful
tool. The cell matrix format is a natural for engineering
calculations, since it shows a process. You start with a few cells
showing initial variables and walk through the calculation row by row
showing intermediate results and a final answer. Adjacent columns
show the effects of variations in problem assumptions. The table form
is neat and orderly and will go into a word processing document
without difficulty.
The biggest difficulty is keeping track of variables, since they
appear as cell references in formulas. Once you get accustomed to the
process, you can 'name' cells with the symbol used in the formula and
change the cell references to the symbol for easier reading and
checking.
Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
chrisw@skypoint.com | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania1864)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 09 2010 - 00:21:23 EST