I dont want to interrupt a happy reunion chat of long lost friends.............
But do we have to read all this....??
KG
- Original Message ----
From: Steve McKenzie <gyro-@hotmail.com>
To: PipingDesign@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 2:18:52 PM
Subject: [PipingDesign] Re: Effect of non-recommended up/downstream distances on
flowmeter accuracy
Paul
I'll bow (wow) to your polish experience, toss.
Since we appear to have abandoned any pretense at maintaining a sense
of decorum, I'll refer you to the ramblings of Dr Spooner who would
have no hesitation in calling you a shining wit.
This isnt improving my knowledge about flowmeter accuracy, though.
Comme tojours
Steve
- In PipingDesign@ yahoogroups. com, Paul Bowers <pbowers@... > wrote:
>
> Steve McKenzie wrote:
> > Paul
> >
> > that last email was a reply to your previous off-list email.
Your "reply-to" appears to wind up as a posting. That said, I retract
the statement about dog turd and substitute the expression canine
fecal matter. In the meantime Ill reread my email etiquette 101 notes.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Steve
>
> Well, at least "canine fecal matter" is more easily polished,
wanker.
>
> Prost,
>
> Paul
>
________________________________________________________________________________\
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Received on Sat Feb 23 07:21:00 2008